Vor Kurzem aufgerufene Suchen


Keine vor kurzem aufgerufene Suchen

Diego Villarreal's Avatar

Diego Villarreal

Beigetreten 23. Aug. 2022

·

Letzte Aktivität 06. Sept. 2022

Folge ich

0

Follower

0

Gesamtaktivitäten

4

Stimmen

0

Abonnement

1

AKTIVITÄTSÜBERSICHT

Neueste Aktivität von Diego Villarreal

Diego Villarreal hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen

KommentarUsing legacy AI agent functionality

Hi Tipene Hughes - we noticed that we can send a payload body with POSTs but not with GET requests. Is it possible to enable us to send a payload in a GET? That would solve our problem of not letting us include e-mails in the URL of the original GET request but rather in the body.

Kommentar anzeigen · Gepostet 06. Sept. 2022 · Diego Villarreal

0

Follower

0

Stimmen

0

Kommentare


Diego Villarreal hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen

KommentarUsing legacy AI agent functionality

Hi Tipene, certainly, here are the steps to reproduce, in Bot Flow Builder:

 - Add Step

 - Make API Call

 - In API Details, include GET Request Method with this type of request https://XXXXXXX.XXXXX.XXXXX/api/admin/users/{{sf.requester.email}}/

 - Select Add Variable and select Responses from Customers: Email, which adds {{sf.requester.email}} as displayed above

 - Press Make API Call and then are asked to include Test Data in the email. I put in my email XXXXXX@gmail.com and get an error "Variables added in the URL path must not contain periods."

Kommentar anzeigen · Gepostet 26. Aug. 2022 · Diego Villarreal

0

Follower

0

Stimmen

0

Kommentare


Diego Villarreal hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen

KommentarUsing legacy AI agent functionality

We're trying to use a GET call to an endpoint on our server that receives a user's e-mail and returns a json with several data points about our user. However, as we try and test it out, we get an error saying that the API call can't include a period so sending an email as a variable in the call doesn't seem to work.

Kommentar anzeigen · Gepostet 23. Aug. 2022 · Diego Villarreal

0

Follower

0

Stimmen

0

Kommentare