Knowledge Capture Reporting Needs Improvement: Should Reflect Actual Knowledge Capture App Usage

3 Comments

  • Brett - Community Manager
    Comment actions Permalink

    Thanks again for sharing this detailed feedback Lila!

    I'll pass this information along to the appropriate team :)

    Cheers!

    0
  • Jacqi Jordan
    Comment actions Permalink

    We are also running into this issue. We need to be able to track the usage of the Knowledge Capture App specifically since it provides an option for our customers to close a ticket while visiting the articles themselves. Adding a link to an article does not provide this functionality. Without breaking out the stats between the Knowledge Capture App and simply pasting a link, how can we track and coach our agents to use the KB appropriately?

    When will the differentiation between the true Knowledge Capture App vs. simply adding a link to a ticket response be broken out?

    0
  • Rafael Franca Silverio
    Comment actions Permalink

    We agreed with Lila.

     

    Our report follows:

     

    We are creating a report using the Knowledge Capture application events to identify the article indications.

    However, we find an occurrence:

    The event used adds indication actions when using the "Link article" option of the Knowledge Capture application, and also when the analyst copies and pastes the article url from the Zendesk Help Center.

    Our problem is that many analysts have macros that contain an article url from the Zendesk Help Center to finalize service with guidelines but not to resolve through an Help Center article. Thus, the numbers will be impacted with indications that should not be counted.

    Therefore, we suggest distinguishing the events of the Knowledge Capture application when the "Link article" option is used and when inserting the url of an article in another way.

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk