Recent searches
No recent searches
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dedc/8dedcbe22afc4d64fea68634ee5eb7389dcfa3e3" alt="Christopher O'Neill's Avatar"
Christopher O'Neill
Joined Apr 06, 2022
·
Last activity Jul 27, 2023
Following
0
Followers
0
Total activity
8
Votes
2
Subscriptions
2
ACTIVITY OVERVIEW
BADGES
ARTICLES
POSTS
COMMUNITY COMMENTS
ARTICLE COMMENTS
ACTIVITY OVERVIEW
Latest activity by Christopher O'Neill
Christopher O'Neill commented,
Amisha Sharma would be open to chatting as well!
View comment · Posted May 27, 2022 · Christopher O'Neill
0
Followers
0
Votes
0
Comments
Christopher O'Neill commented,
@... they are exclusively "Detected as spam". But many are from our customers, email addresses like "john@company.com" and bodies containing product questions, i.e. not spammy things like "sign up for access to your own crypto account" etc.
View comment · Posted Apr 25, 2022 · Christopher O'Neill
0
Followers
0
Votes
0
Comments
Christopher O'Neill commented,
+1 to Matthew's comment. We get a huge false positive rate on incoming emails, approaching double digits. How can we loosen these rules to ensure valid tickets aren't suspended?
View comment · Posted Apr 06, 2022 · Christopher O'Neill
0
Followers
1
Vote
0
Comments
Christopher O'Neill commented,
Big +1 to this.
The previous behavior, sharing the drafted text as you switched between public and internal, was both more intuitive and allowed for safer drafting of agent responses.
As teams, we've all had those stomach dropping moments where you send a public reply that was supposed to be an internal note. I always tell agents to draft in internal, then move to public only when you're ready to send it.
Amisha Sharma, any context on why this was changed and what the hoped for benefit was? I'm curious if I'm missing an advantage of this workflow.
View comment · Posted Apr 06, 2022 · Christopher O'Neill
0
Followers
7
Votes
0
Comments