Comments by users not explicitly added to the ticket will be flagged
Hi
Can you please choose a different background colour for notes that have been posted to tickets by customers that were not explicitly on the original ticket.
At the moment its yellow - the same colour as an Internal note and it looks like an internal note at first glance. Its very confusing to some agents.
Can we have it blue? or red? or green? anything but yellow please!
Many thanks
G.Jackson
-
As an example...
The top note is from a customer - not an internal note. Yet looks like an internal note :(
-
Great point! Up-voted.
-
Additionally confusing, they are listed under the Internal conversations in the top header. I was immediately concerned about internal comments being visible to these users, but was assured they are not by Zendesk. The should have their own grouping in the conversation bar and a distinct color from Agent comments.
-
Upvoted! Agents are quite confused by the presence of user replies in Internal notes, a place that we've drilled into them is a 'safe' place.
Please increase the visibility of the notification on the top right of the comment ( no one ever sees them) and change the background colour of these notifications!
-
I sixth this request ;-)
I'm a fan of the "comment by an unverified user is not considered public", however, treating it as any other private (agent) comment should not be the final result of this feature.
-
Definitely - this suggestion is already elsewhere. This has created confusion... a non-agent comment should never look like an agent private comment. Non-agents cannot make private notes... but oh, they can! :-(
-
We also just discovered another side effect, that because these are considered private comments, SLA policy is not being applied. The ticket is being reopened, but does not have a "Next SLA Breach"
-
We'd like the option to make these public!
-
How come this still has not been addressed by ZenDesk?!
This is confusing and customers are clearly specifying why right here.
Is this going to be fixed? -
Hi Retouching -
There are some big changes being planned for the Support workflow and UI in the coming year, so I have flagged this thread as one of the ones for PM's to read through as they determine what the highest priority changes are. However up to this point it has not been deemed higher priority than other requests or plans.
-
Hi Zendesk folks!
Just wanted to add another point here:If an organization uses G-Suite groups, and an agent CC's a G-Suite group on the ticket, then the response from any group member is also logged as an internal note.
Looking closely at the internal note, you can see that Zendesk notifies agents that "user_name was not a part of this conversation". This defeats the purpose though as I have to manually copy-paste the response that got logged as an internal note and then re-share it in a public reply.
Can anyone provide a workaround? Thanks!
-
I run into this problem almost daily, is there any update regarding this?
Maybe just a small change as changing the background color? -
Fully agree, flagged comments should not look like internal notes. It clearly defeats the intended purpose as an internal note adds credibility to the comment as looking like an official note.
-
+1 to this request and also the possibility for us to either whitelist users/domains or manually make the comment public.
See my comments on this matter here:
https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203661606/comments/360002902633
...and here:
https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203661606/comments/360002928993
...and Zendesk's response here:
https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203661606/comments/360002932573 -
We're experiencing the same issue as Stephen explained in his comment with how the comments affect SLAs. https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360000993288/comments/360001257007
I don't mind the comments being hidden from the requester, but would like SLAs to apply as if they were public or being able to choose that setting. I have implemented some automations based on SLAs, but these tickets fall through the cracks as they don't have SLAs.
I frequently get questions from confused agents with who these comments come from, so it would be beneficial to have them be a different color to call them out rather than just the safety icon.
-
+1
This is still not fixed... is it at least in the pipeline? :)
-
Sorry, but this is becoming a nuisance.
When can this be fixed?
-
We have a slight variation to this, but the same concerns applies.
Example:
- We get a support request via email from person@company.com.
- We reply.
- Then that person replies to the email but with their support@company.com email address.
This flags the reply as "not part of this conversation".
Also, does that person see this comment in the email replies and in the Help Center, or is their own replies invisible to them?
I understand that this, if not implemented, could be used as email relay spam, but if it's from the same organization, it should be safe.
Please, could we have an official update to this?
Nicole S. wrote this two years ago
There are some big changes being planned for the Support workflow and UI in the coming year, so I have flagged this thread as one of the ones for PM's to read through as they determine what the highest priority changes are. However up to this point it has not been deemed higher priority than other requests or plans.
-
Can we please have an update on this Nicole S. as it's been some time since initially mentioned, and it's continuing to create confusion for service desk users.
Iniciar sesión para dejar un comentario.
19 Comentarios