Búsquedas recientes


No hay búsquedas recientes

Crunchy API's Avatar

Crunchy API

Incorporación 07 sept 2024

·

Última actividad 03 feb 2025

Seguimientos

0

Seguidores

0

Actividad total

15

Votos

8

Suscripciones

2

RESUMEN DE LA ACTIVIDAD

Última actividad de Crunchy API

Crunchy API hizo un comentario,

Comentario de la comunidad Q&A - Objects, workspaces, and rules

Sure, but I think the concern is that a placeholder that has the `*_html`suffix would always return/render the HTML (properly escaped, etc). Such that there is no inconsistency in behavior of the placeholder across different usages.

For instance, why would `latest_public_comment_html` render as HTML in an email or other medium, but not in a webhook? If the API can return HTML as strings in the JSON response, why can't a webhook do the same? Like I said, it's just not intuitive given the naming of the placeholder.

I accept that this is the nature of how Zendesk has chosen to implement this behavior. But these kinds of inconsistencies is quite frustrating to work with as developers and engineers.

Ver comentario · Publicado 03 feb 2025 · Crunchy API

0

Seguidores

0

Votos

0

Comentarios


Crunchy API hizo un comentario,

Comentario de la comunidad Feedback - Admin Center

Yeah, it would be great to be able to reclaim my personal account so that I can change my name back! :-)

Ver comentario · Publicado 08 ene 2025 · Crunchy API

0

Seguidores

0

Votos

0

Comentarios


Crunchy API hizo un comentario,

Comentario de la comunidad Q&A - Objects, workspaces, and rules

I stumbled on the following in the placeholder reference:

> Although placeholders can be in HTML format, when a placeholder is sent to a URL target or webhook, unformatted text is used to render the placeholder, not HTML. Also, placeholders won't work within code blocks. 

So, not a bug… but not intuitive either… if a placeholder is documented to return a particular format, then I would expect it to always do such. Not behave differently dependent of the context that it's used. Quite disappointing.

Ver comentario · Publicado 11 oct 2024 · Crunchy API

0

Seguidores

0

Votos

0

Comentarios


Crunchy API hizo un comentario,

Comentario de la comunidad Q&A - Objects, workspaces, and rules

I'm seeing the same behavior. And the ability to send the raw HTML to a webhook as well. Perhaps this is a bug in the placeholders?

Ver comentario · Publicado 11 oct 2024 · Crunchy API

0

Seguidores

0

Votos

0

Comentarios


Crunchy API hizo un comentario,

Comentario de la comunidad Feedback - Admin Center

+1 - having a light user would be very useful and appreciated. Also, I would like to see the ability to setup some kind of no-login ‘service account’ that doesn't consume and admin or agent seat. Simply for use with custom integrations making API requests, etc.

Ver comentario · Publicado 07 sept 2024 · Crunchy API

0

Seguidores

1

Voto

0

Comentarios