Recherches récentes


Pas de recherche récente

Ulugbek M.'s Avatar

Ulugbek M.

Adhésion le 26 déc. 2022

·

Dernière activité le 13 mars 2023

Suivis

0

Abonnés

0

Activité totale

8

Votes

0

Abonnements

3

APERÇU DES ACTIVITÉS

Dernière activité effectuée par Ulugbek M.

Ulugbek M. a ajouté un commentaire,

Commentaire de la communauté Q&A - Reporting and analytics

Thank you. 

Afficher le commentaire · Publication le 13 mars 2023 · Ulugbek M.

0

Abonnés

0

Votes

0

Commentaire


Ulugbek M. a créé une publication,

Publication Q&A - Reporting and analytics

Good day. 

I have a question. 

The situation is like this. 

  1. an end-user creates a ticket,
  2. Agent 1 replies within 25 seconds (so FRT goes to Agent 1) 
  3. Agent 1 puts the ticket to 'On-hold' status
  4. Agent 2 replies to the ticket and solves it 
  5. the ticket is assigned to the Agent 2

Then I create a report and I see that FRT metric is reflected to the Agent 2, rather than Agent 1. 

Example: 

First reply time – 25 sec
Assignee – Agent 2

And I assume that Agent 2 has replied to the ticket within 25 secs and it is not true. 

Does anyone has an idea how to separate FRT so that I could see in a Report the actual list of agents performed on the FRT metric and not the ones who solved the ticket?
 

Modification le 10 mars 2023 · Ulugbek M.

0

Abonnés

3

Votes

2

Commentaires


Ulugbek M. a ajouté un commentaire,

Commentaire de la communauté Developer - Zendesk SDKs

Eric Nelson, Sure, thank you. 

Afficher le commentaire · Publication le 09 mars 2023 · Ulugbek M.

0

Abonnés

0

Votes

0

Commentaire


Ulugbek M. a créé une publication,

Publication Developer - Zendesk SDKs

Sometimes we get 'Android User e18efebe087ffbd5e93b6042' in a messaging ticket created by a customer. 

Any advice? 

Publication le 09 mars 2023 · Ulugbek M.

0

Abonnés

2

Votes

2

Commentaires


Ulugbek M. a ajouté un commentaire,

CommentaireZendesk messaging

Good day. 

Is Zendesk planning to separate message status as a stand alone attribute for messaging? It seems to be more convenient to find a workaround or the best solution by using that kind of attribute rather than using Continuous conversations. For my case Continuous conversations feature disrupts the logic of the bot-flow by interfering into the 'When closed' flows of the bot by suddenly sending a message requesting an email. Moreover this message cannot be amended in any way, which also shrinks the way it can be efectively used. 

And for @https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/profiles/1263758747090-Sara the trigger is supposed to work only when the Department is offline by default. However you might try to amend it in the Chat's 'Trigger' section. 

Afficher le commentaire · Publication le 26 déc. 2022 · Ulugbek M.

0

Abonnés

0

Votes

0

Commentaire