Pesquisas recentes
Sem pesquisas recentes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed95b/ed95b4413de42f78ea1db943482be1d6847b3263" alt="Support Department's Avatar"
Support Department
Entrou em 15 de abr. de 2021
·
Última atividade em 14 de out. de 2024
Seguindo
0
Seguidores
0
Atividade total
38
Votos
15
Assinaturas
14
VISÃO GERAL DA ATIVIDADE
MEDALHAS
ARTIGOS
PUBLICAÇÕES
COMENTÁRIOS NA COMUNIDADE
COMENTÁRIOS EM ARTIGOS
VISÃO GERAL DA ATIVIDADE
Atividade mais recente por Support Department
Support Department comentou,
Ok..so this is an 'intelligent' bot. In this case, is deleting the web-request page 'new_request_page.hbs' be the solution? Or do I have other options?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 09 de ago. de 2023 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
Shouldn't commenting-out {{request_form}} already do the job?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 09 de ago. de 2023 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
Thank you for your response. I believe you're referring to the second 'custom theme' section in the linked article. Meaning, I would need to edit the standard theme, e.g. by removing the request-form page? Keeping the request-form page, but 'hiding/commenting-out' the request form {{request_form}} doesn't change the situation. The spam-bot can still send requests via the web-form.
Exibir comentário · Publicado 09 de ago. de 2023 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department criou uma publicação,
We have two reasons why we want to deactivate the request form on the
/hc/en-us/requests/new)
page.
1. We dont want user to submit queries via this channel.
2. Some spam-bot is bombing us via the request-form.
Publicado 08 de ago. de 2023 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
2
Votos
6
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
Hi Austin,
Thank you for the answer. In our case we have some specific article links embedded and which show up when typical keywords are in the request (used liquid for that).
Haven't tried Google Analytics yet, but will do so. Is this the only option?
Would there also be a HTML option (e.g. an embedded button which 'fires' some actions when clicked by the requester)?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 28 de jul. de 2021 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
I have added links to KB articles in automated replies to customers. But I never know if the requester clicked the link.
Is there any way or trick with liquid to find out whether this link has been clicked (viewed) by the customer?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 15 de jul. de 2021 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
Hi,
I want to use {{answer_bot.article_count}} and {{answer_bot.article_list}} in a Notify Target action.
As I understand all triggers that are to fire upon the same triggering event are evaluated and then fire 'together'.
I have following scenarios:
Scenario 1:
- Event: Ticket is created:
- Action: Trigger 1: add some links and information in email reply+ Suggest AB articles to requester + set Tag ab_fired + Notify Target (internal) of suggested articles (with above placeholders).
- Result: the target doesn't receive the list of suggested articles.
On the other hand if I change the above to:
Scenario1:
- Event: Ticket is created
- Actions:
- Trigger cycle 1:
- Trigger 1: add some links and information in email reply + Suggest AB articles to requester + set Tag 'ab_fired'
- Trigger cycle 2:
- Trigger 2 (fires on tag 'ab_fired'): Notify Target (internal) of suggested articles (with above placeholders)
- Result: Target receives list of suggested articles.
Questions:
- Are there runtime issues that cause the first scenario?
- If the 2nd scenario is the correct way to go, then can you confirm that the suggested list in Trigger 2 is always the same as the list suggested in Trigger 1, i.e. will the placeholder always only return analysed results of the first comment sent by the requester, or will it now (in Trigger 2) also analyse all text in all preceding comments (this would include the links and information added to comments in Trigger 1) in previous trigger cycles?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 08 de jun. de 2021 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
It's working! Thanks a lot!
Exibir comentário · Publicado 11 de jun. de 2020 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Support Department comentou,
This sounds way better than closing a ticket.
However, I'm not getting it work. What do I have to set as attribute to get a Private (internal) comment?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 11 de jun. de 2020 · Support Department
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários