Pesquisas recentes
Sem pesquisas recentes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a26a/4a26a41627df9453c2396af6685b77f4750235a2" alt="Maik Künnemann's Avatar"
Maik Künnemann
Entrou em 16 de abr. de 2021
·
Última atividade em 05 de jul. de 2023
Seguindo
0
Seguidores
0
Atividade total
110
Votos
38
Assinaturas
36
VISÃO GERAL DA ATIVIDADE
MEDALHAS
ARTIGOS
PUBLICAÇÕES
COMENTÁRIOS NA COMUNIDADE
COMENTÁRIOS EM ARTIGOS
VISÃO GERAL DA ATIVIDADE
Atividade mais recente por Maik Künnemann
Maik Künnemann comentou,
We have the same issue - the linked EAP is no longer available. Whats the status of this? This was more than 2 years ago.
Exibir comentário · Publicado 19 de out. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
1
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann comentou,
There is a request, but still no feedback from the product manager Amisha Sharma .
https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/4408860670106-Customize-Agent-Workspace
Exibir comentário · Publicado 23 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann criou uma publicação,
If a reply to an already closed ticket ends up in the locked tickets and is subsequently restored, no connection is made to the original ticket. Accordingly, the note in the follow up ticket is missing and the agents do not know that it is a follow up ticket.
Publicado 22 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
2
Seguidores
2
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann criou uma publicação,
If I use a webhook with a ticket id placeholder inside the url, the activity log dont show any information about the used url. So I don't know anything about the request if the body was empty. Could you please add the request url to the activity log information?
Publicado 22 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
4
Seguidores
2
Votos
1
Comentário
Maik Künnemann comentou,
Hi @...
The last 3 years it was possible to activate a SLA with a ticket update via API and a empty end user comment body:
{
"ticket": {
"comment": {
"body": "",
"author_id": 376666831978,
"public": true
}
}
}
Since july 29 nothing happens anymore. Before the change, the SLA was started with such API request. See this screenshot:
We used this workflow for quite different cases, e.g.
- Starting the SLA for proactive tickets
- Starting the SLA after adding internal comments
- Restarting the SLA because only one public comment was sent as an intermediate message, but a follow-up message must be sent to the customer within a new SLA.
All these cases were realized with a trigger + webhook + the API call above.
So we have to know why was this changed? What are the new workarounds to realize the cases shown?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 09 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann comentou,
Hi @...
The last 3 years it was possible to activate a SLA with a ticket update via API and a empty end user comment body:
{
"ticket": {
"comment": {
"body": "",
"author_id": 376666831978,
"public": true
}
}
}
Since july 29 nothing happens anymore. Before the change, the SLA was started with such API request. See this screenshot:
We used this workflow for quite different cases, e.g.
- Starting the SLA for proactive tickets
- Starting the SLA after adding internal comments
- Restarting the SLA because only one public comment was sent as an intermediate message, but a follow-up message must be sent to the customer within a new SLA.
All these cases were realized with a trigger + webhook + the API call above.
So we have to know why was this changed? What are the new workarounds to realize the cases shown?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 09 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann comentou,
If I use a webhook with a ticket id placeholder inside the url, the activity log dont show any information about the used url. So I don't know anything about the request if the body was empty. Could you please add the request url to the activity log information?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 03 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann comentou,
The problem is the wrong check mark, not the visible ticket. The ticket can be in the view, but not with a check mark for "skill match", when the other view said "no skill match"
Exibir comentário · Publicado 01 de ago. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann comentou,
Hi @... there is a bug if a ticket has no skills:
- the view column "skill match" said "match"
- the view condition "skills" said "no match"
It must be equal - either a ticket without skills is interpreted as "no match" or "match" - but not once like this and once like that!
Exibir comentário · Publicado 22 de jul. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários
Maik Künnemann comentou,
Hello Amisha Sharma we talked about the topic from Gail. Do you have an update for this feature?
Exibir comentário · Publicado 20 de jul. de 2022 · Maik Künnemann
0
Seguidores
0
Votos
0
Comentários