最近搜索
没有最近搜索
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/246e3/246e3f738420f1f4bcc397fbd75a2f678aa856c0" alt="Mike Bielby's Avatar"
Mike Bielby
已加入2021年5月13日
·
最后活动2021年10月16日
关注
0
关注者
0
活动总数
3
投票
0
订阅
1
活动概览
标记
文章
帖子
社区评论
文章评论
活动概览
的最新活动 Mike Bielby
Mike Bielby 进行了评论,
Sure, and thanks for the reply. It's true the agent can set the ticket that is now being looked at by R&D, but when we review the defects weekly we want to see only "Open" and > 7 days old with no updates that are not "on-hold". It seems tickets with "on-hold" status are treated as "Open" and so we get the "Open" and "on-hold" defects. We don't want to see the "on-hold" ones. We are going to try something on Thursday and I'll update the community then. Thanks for the reply.
查看评论 · 已于 2021年4月20日 发布 · Mike Bielby
0
关注者
0
投票
0
评论
Mike Bielby 进行了评论,
Wow! this little feature has been in play for 7 years now and I'm not sure it's resolved. It seems there is a standard use case that everyone that has a development group wants, but you taking 7 years to understand it/develop it/issue the feature. As an agent I want to set an open ticket to "on-hold" status so that the end customer understand that the ticket is either in the Development team as a bug or a pending feature request (in other words, it's not needing any further input from the customer). We'd like this feature as we run a report of all open issues > 7 days with no input from agent. At the moment that includes all the usual suspects that are in R&D or are with Offer management as feature requests to be assessed. 'urry up with this one please. BTW it's a great product and you should be very proud. Still... we need this!
查看评论 · 已于 2021年4月19日 发布 · Mike Bielby
0
关注者
0
投票
0
评论