Preview link expiry timeframe is too short
Please extend the validity of the article preview link beyond 1 hour.
It is unrealistic to expect others to review content within such a short time frame.
3 business days would be the minimum. Thank you
I was really surprised to just discover this as well. We often ask subject-matter experts to review our articles and 1 hour assumes they are free to do so in the next hour. A few business days would be much more appropriate.
For now, we are making PDFs of the previews, which are quite ugly of course.
I agree - it would be nice if the preview time was configurable.
We like to share our documentation internally before it's published with the release. The 1 hour time frame certainly doesn't work for that.
Please sign in to leave a comment.