最近の検索


最近の検索はありません

Preview link expiry timeframe is too short



投稿日時:2022年11月23日

Please extend the validity of the article preview link beyond 1 hour. 

It is unrealistic to expect others to review content within such a short time frame. 

3 business days would be the minimum. Thank you 


3

5

5件のコメント

I was really surprised to just discover this as well. We often ask subject-matter experts to review our articles and 1 hour assumes they are free to do so in the next hour. A few business days would be much more appropriate.

For now, we are making PDFs of the previews, which are quite ugly of course.

1


I agree - it would be nice if the preview time was configurable. 

We like to share our documentation internally before it's published with the release. The 1 hour time frame certainly doesn't work for that.

1


I'm disappointed to learn this information. It makes it harder to review changes with my team. Also, why is it so hard to find this information in the docs?

1


Is there an update to this request? 

0


image avatar

Shawna James

Community Product Feedback Specialist

Hey everyone
 
Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your feedback. This has been logged for our PM team to review. At this time, there is no update on progress for this feature request. We understand that is not exactly the news you are looking to recite but I did want to make sure you understood that this feedback has been submitted for intake. For others who may be interested in this feature request, please add your support by upvoting this post and/or adding your use case to the comments below. Thank you again!

0


サインインしてコメントを残してください。

お探しのものが見つかりませんか?

新規投稿